1 The deficit is extraordinary.
"We are confronted with a situation where the scale of deficits is truly extraordinary. 12.5% of GDP is not something which would have ben expected a year ago. This reflects the scale of the global downturn, but it also reflects the fact that we came into this crisis with fiscal policy on a path that wasn't sustainable and a correction was needed."
2 Plans for deficit reduction must be more ambitious
There needs to be a plan for the lifetime of the next parliament, contingent upon the state of the economy, which demonstrates how the deficit will be brought down. Brought down to levels below those shown in the budget figures. "If the economy were to recover along the path assumed in the budget projections of GDP then I think the time over which deficits need to be reduced is likely to have to be faster than was implied by that projection.”
3 Financing the deficits could be problematic
Without a credible action plan to bring the public finances back in line, the government could struggle to find buyers for its debts in the years ahead. "Although we are finding it easy now to finance those deficits by issuing gilts, there could be problems down the road. We need a credible statement of what will guide the deficit reduction."
Under Darling's forecasts, set out in the budget, it will take until 2013-14 to bring the government's current deficit down to 5.5% of national income. But King thinks the budget should be returned to balance faster.
So what should the Treasury and Chancellor Darling do?
1 History tells us the impact of a financial crisis leads to a dramatic increase in government borrowing as the recession impacts. The deficit is not so extraordinary in an historical context.
2 Undertake or commission a formal review and update of the quantum of the “fiscal stabilisers”, the impact on spending could be as much as £100 billion in the current year. The reversal of the stabilisers as the economy recovers could yield a dramatic reduction in the scale of borrowing and more quickly than envisaged.
3 Undertake a review of the trend rate of growth and the output gap assessments. The observed rate of GDP growth over 40 years is just over 2.4%, the Bank estimates a trend rate around 2.5% but the Treasury adheres to an unrealistic trend rate of 2.75%.
The combination of the reviews would produce a clearer understanding of the output gap and the “cyclically adjusted deficits”.
4 Commission a review of the potential programme of banking sector assets disposals, which could yield significant gains and assist the debt reduction process as the economy recovers and the upsides in the plan are achieved. Assuming for example that Stephen Hester achieves the £9 million bonus package what would be the potential returns to HMG.
5 Accept the twin deficits of the current account and the Public Sector debt are evidence of a structural problem within the UK economy, to which the Governor alludes in his comments. Some reduction in spending and an increase in consumption taxes are high on the agenda as the economy recovers to address the imbalance. Remedial action is required but "contingent upon the state of the economy".
UK Economics news and analysis : no politics, no dogma, no polemics, just facts.
Sign up and "subscribe" for e-mail notification of updates.





